ALIGNING STAKEHOLDER NEEDS WITH PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS USING A MULTI-STAKEHOLDER SURVEY

ALIGNING STAKEHOLDER NEEDS WITH PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS USING A MULTI-STAKEHOLDER SURVEY

M. Ormazabal, N. Serrano, C. Blanco, F. Carazo, J. Aldazábal, S. Azasu (2022).  ALIGNING STAKEHOLDER NEEDS WITH PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS USING A MULTI-STAKEHOLDER SURVEY. 610-621.

From the 2020/21, the School of Engineering at the University of Navarra joined the CDIO network. This paper describes the first step of the process of adapting the programs to the CDIO paradigm: the extent of compliance of the implemented programs with the key components of the CDIO syllabus as well as the extent to which these programs provide graduates with skills specified in the CDIO syllabus. Multiple approaches to data collection were used. The skills and competencies of the different engineering programs were mapped against the components of the CDIO syllabus. This was followed by a questionnaire survey for employers of past graduates. The core of this questionnaire consisted of their opinions of the importance of the various components of the CDIO syllabus and an assessment of the level of proficiency of these skills and competencies in our graduates who work in their companies. A second survey, a tracer study of engineering alumni, also consisted of their opinions on the extent to which the engineering programs provided them with the skills and competencies specified in the CDIO syllabus. Finally, a third survey was conducted among the School's teachers on the importance of a subset of these competencies and the possibility of developing them in their courses. The mapping exercise confirmed the presence of the competencies in the syllabuses; however, the employer survey revealed gaps in the required proficiency levels of the most important skills. The results of alumni and teachers also provided information on the quality of the degree programs and are useful in validating employers’ opinions. In addition, information was obtained from the teacher’s survey in order to draw up the map of competencies for each program.

Authors (New): 
Marta Ormazabal
Nicolás Serrano
Carmen Blanco
Fernando Carazo
Javier Aldazábal
Samuel Azasu
Pages: 
610-621
Affiliations: 
University of Navarra, Spain
Keywords: 
CDIO Syllabus
Program assessment
Stakeholders
employers
alumni
CDIO Standard 2
CDIO Standard 12
Year: 
2022
Reference: 
Crawley, E. F. (2001). The CDIO Syllabus. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Available from http://www.cdio.org/files/CDIO_Syllabus_Report.pdf.: 
Crawley, E., Malmqvist, J., Ostlund, S., Brodeur, D., & Edström, K. (2007). Rethinking engineering education. The CDIO Approach, 302, 60-62.First edition. New York: Springer Verlag.: 
Crawley, E.F., J. Malmqvist, S. Östlund, D.R. Brodeur, and K. Edström (2014) Rethinking Engineering Education: The CDIO Approach. Second edition. New York: Springer Verlag.: 
Edström, K. and A. Kolmos. (2014) PBL and CDIO: Complementary Models for Engineering Education Development. European Journal of Engineering Education, 39:5, 539–55: 
Edwards M, Sánchez-Ruiz LM, Sanchez-Diaz C (2009), Achieving competence-based curriculum in engineering education in Spain. Proceedings of the IEEE, 97(10), 1727-1736.: 
Fuentes Del Burgo, J., & Navarro Astor, E. (2016). What is engineering education for? Listening to the voices of some Spanish building engineers. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology. Vol. 14 No. 4, 2016 pp. 897-919.: 
Grant, C. D., & Dickson, B. R. (2006). Personal skills in chemical engineering graduates: the development of skills within degree programmes to meet the needs of employers. Education for Chemical Engineers, 1(1), 23-29.: 
Khoo, E., Zegwaard, K., & Adam, A. (2020). Employer and academic staff perceptions of science and engineering graduate competencies. Australasian Journal of Engineering Education, 25(1), 103-118.: 
Kolmos A., Holgaard J.E. (2019) Employability in Engineering Education: Are Engineering Student s Ready for Work?. In: Christensen S., Delahousse B., Didier C., Meganck M., Murphy M. (eds) The Engineering-Business Nexus. Philosophy of Engineering and Technology, vol 32. Springer, Cham.: 
Lleo, A., Agholor, D., Serrano, N., & Prieto-Sandoval, V. (2018). A mentoring programme based on competency development at a Spanish university: an action research study. European Journal of Engineering Education, 43(5), 706–724.: 
Loyer, S., Muñoz, M., Cárdenas, C., Martínez, C., Cepeda, M., & Faúndez, V. (2011). A CDIO approach to curriculum design of five engineering programs at UCSC. In Proceedings of the 7th International CDIO Conference, Technical University of Denmark, Copenhagen (p. 16).: 
Malmqvist, J., Edström, K., Gunnarsson, S., & Östlund, S. (2005). Use of CDIO Standards in Swedish national evaluation of engineering educational programs. In Proceedings 1st Annual CDIO Conference (pp. 134-137).: 
May, E., & Strong, D. S. (2006). Is engineering education delivering what industry requires. Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA).: 
Pinsonneault, A., & Kraemer, K. (1993). Survey research methodology in management information systems: an assessment. Journal of management information systems, 10(2), 75-105.: 
Prados, J. W., Peterson, G. D., and Aberle, K. B. (2001). A Vision for Change: The Transformation of US Educational Quality Assurance in Engineering. Paper presented at the SEFI (European Society for Engineering Education) Conference, Copenhagen, Denmark: 
National Institutes of Health, Office of Human Resources. Competency Proficiency Scale, 2019 https://hr.nih.gov/working-nih/competencies/competencies-proficiency-scale (accessed 14/01/2022).: 
Go to top
randomness