ENABLING LIFELONG LEARNING BY USING MULTIPLE ENGAGEMENT TOOLS

ENABLING LIFELONG LEARNING BY USING MULTIPLE ENGAGEMENT TOOLS

D. Puglisi, G. Domènech-Gil (2023).  ENABLING LIFELONG LEARNING BY USING MULTIPLE ENGAGEMENT TOOLS . 633-643.

This study aims to identify effective engagement tools and strategies that may strengthen student learning processes with a long-term impact. The context of learning plays an active role in student performance and needs to be carefully considered when designing collaborative learning environments. In the framework of a CDIO course entitled Project Course in Applied Physics (12 ECTS), master’s students in applied physics, electrical engineering, biomedical engineering, material science and nanotechnology work in groups of four to seven people for realizing their own project idea given three broad requirements: (i) use gas sensors, (ii) manage a certain maximum budget to purchase components, and (iii) build a working prototype for any indoor air quality monitoring application of interest for them and their customer. Groups are generally multicultural and multidisciplinary. Qualified supervision and skills training activities are adapted to facilitate the students’ progress and guarantee the success of their project work. Based on observations, feedback, and results over a five-year period, this approach appears more engaging and inspiring for both students and teachers compared to more defined projects. Encouraging the students to conceive their own original ideas, involving them in the co-creation of the learning process, and building knowledge, understanding, and skills through a variety of engaging experiences, helps their motivation, interest, active participation, and creativity with a direct impact on the quality of their learning. As an example of successful project work, here we report on two groups of students at Linköping University, Sweden, who have recently designed, developed, and tested an innovative sensor system prototype for smart monitoring of gas and particle emissions from cooking activities. The project course has received 5.0/5.0 as an overall students’ evaluation.

Authors (New): 
Donatella Puglisi
Guillem Domènech-Gil
Pages: 
633-643
Affiliations: 
Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
Keywords: 
lifelong learning
Experiential Learning
Active learning
Skills training
Multicultural environment
Engagement
CDIO Standard 1
CDIO Standard 2
CDIO Standard 5
CDIO Standard 6
CDIO Standard 8
CDIO Standard 11
Year: 
2023
Reference: 
Barmeyer, C. I. (2004). Learning Styles and Their Impact on Cross-Cultural Training: An International Comparison in France, Germany and Quebec. International Journal of Intercultural Relations 28: 577-594.: 
CDIO Standards 3.0, available at http://www.cdio.org/content/cdio-standards-30: 
Chiriac, E. H. (2014). Group Work as an Incentive for Learning – Students’ Experiences of Group Work. Frontiers in Physicology 5 (558): 1-10.: 
Domènech-Gil, G., Silander, J., Skoglund, L., Bégon, B., Grönlund Falk, O., Håkansson, M., Rutberg, V., Valentin, F., Forsgren, M., Guo, S., Dettke, T., Lyu, W., Mohammadianrasnani, Z., Ortega Santos, A. B., Martinez Gil, J. G., Eriksson, J., Puglisi, D. (2022), Smart stove hood with embedded sensors: a student project. Extended Abstract of the Indoor Air 2022 Conference, Kuopio, Finland: University of Eastern Finland.: 
Hofstede, G. (1986). Cultural Differences in Teaching and Learning. International Journal of Intercultural Relations 10: 301-320.: 
Jonassen, D. H., Grabowski., B. L. (1993). Handbook of Individual Differences, Learning, and Instruction. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.: 
Joy, S., Kolb, D. A. (2009). Are There Cultural Differences in Learning Styles? International Journal of Intercultural Relations 33: 69-85.: 
Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential Learning: Experience as a Source of Learning and Development. Prentice-Hall.: 
Limerick, D., Cunnington, B. (1993). Managing the New Organization. Collaborative Individualism and the End of the Corporative Citizen. Chatswood: Business & Professional Publishing.: 
Meseke, C. A., Nafziger, R., Meseke, J. K. (2010). Student Attitudes, Satisfaction, and Learning in a Collaborative Testing Environment. The Journal of Chiropractic Education 24 (1): 19-29.: 
Planthaber, O. (2021). LiU students invent a smart kitchen solution, Linköping University News, 17 Dec.: 
Signorini, P., Wiesemes, R., Murphy, R. (2009). Developing Alternative Frameworks for Exploring Intercultural Learning: a Critique of Hofstede’s Cultural Difference Model. Teaching in Higher Education 14 (3): 253-264.: 
Totten, S., Sills, T., Digby, A., Russ, P. (1991). Cooperative Learning: A Guide to Research. New York: Garland.: 
Go to top
randomness