STRATEGIES FOR THE MATHEMATICS LEARNING IN ENGINEERING CDIO CURRICULA

STRATEGIES FOR THE MATHEMATICS LEARNING IN ENGINEERING CDIO CURRICULA

A. González, M. León, M. Sarmiento (2020).  STRATEGIES FOR THE MATHEMATICS LEARNING IN ENGINEERING CDIO CURRICULA. Volume 2, pp.206-215.

A marker of success for students in a curriculum of engineering is their performance in the first-year transition. Associated with the CDIO reform in the Faculty of Engineering at the Pontificia Universidad Javeriana (PUJ), strategies focused on supporting students in this transition have been defined. One of these strategies aims to develop mathematical thinking and strengthen students' skills for solving problems through a workshop parallel to the first-year math course. The workshop seeks for students to establish a model of learning mathematics focused on reinforcing basic concepts (numerical, algebraic and variational), building up self-efficacy, developing metacognitive skills, and mathematical abstract thinking. Therefore, this strategy has implied challenges in training and following-up faculty. Results confirm that students recognize the importance of developing mathematical skills for their learning process in engineering. Additionally, the perception of professors supports the hypothesis that students need to reinforce previous concepts from school and develop problem-solving skills to achieve engineering design projects. The workshop has allowed a better adaptation of first-year students to their academic process at university.

Authors (New): 
Alejandra González
Maria Patricia León
María Alejandra Sarmiento
Pages: 
Volume 2, pp.206-215
Affiliations: 
Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Colombia
Keywords: 
Engineering
higher education
Math performance
self-regulated learning
self-efficacy
CDIO Standard 7
CDIO Standard 8
Year: 
2020
Reference: 
Aiken, Lewis R. (1974). Two Scales of Attitude toward Mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 5(2), 67-71. : 
https://doi.org/10.2307/748616
García-Ros, R., & Pérez-González, F. (2012). Spanish Version of the Time Management Behavior Questionnaire for University Students. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 15(3), 1485-1494. : 
https://doi.org/10.5209/rev_SJOP.2012.v15.n3.39432
Huertas Bustos, A., Vesga Bravo, G., & Galindo León, M. (2014). Validación del instrumento ‘Inventario de Habilidades Metacognitivas (MAI)’ con estudiantes colombianos. Praxis & Saber, 5(10), 55-74. : 
https://doi.org/10.19053/22160159.3022
Ku, H.-Y., Tseng, H. W., & Akarasriworn, C. (2013). Collaboration factors, teamwork satisfaction, and student attitudes toward online collaborative learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(3), 922-929. : 
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.12.019
León, J., Nuñez, J. L., & Liew, J. (2015). Self-determination and STEM education: Effects of autonomy, motivation, and self-regulated learning on high school math achievement. Learning and Individual Differences, 43, 156-163. : 
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2015.08.017
Martínez, J., & Pantevis, M. (2010). Hábitos de estudio: percepción de los Estudiantes de pregrado para el desarrollo de competencias básicas. Congreso Iberoamericano de Educación - Metas 2021, 1-22.: 
Musso, M. F., Boekaerts, M., Segers, M., & Cascallar, E. C. (2019). Individual differences in basic cognitive processes and self-regulated learning: Their interaction effects on math performance. Learning and Individual Differences, 71, 58-70. : 
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2019.03.003
Roick, J., & Ringeisen, T. (2018). Students' math performance in higher education: Examining the role of self-regulated learning and self-efficacy. Learning and Individual Differences, 65, 148-158. : 
https://doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2018.05.018
Zheng, J., Xing, W., Zhu, G., Chen, G., Zhao., H & Xie, C. (2020). Profiling self-regulation behaviors in STEM learning of engineering design. Computers & Education, 143, 1-13. : 
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103669
Go to top